Difference between revisions of "Shared:Rhizome2KickOff"
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ __NOTITLE__ =='''Rhizome 2.0: Scaling-up Capability of Human-Robot Interaction Supported Approaches for Robotically 3D-printing Extraterrestrial Habitats'''== <di...") |
(→Kick-off meeting) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
'''Presentation:''' | '''Presentation:''' | ||
<br>Henriette Bier: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1S81X1cv65G7uPPnnCV-3fl-NHqJTapVt/view | <br>Henriette Bier: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1S81X1cv65G7uPPnnCV-3fl-NHqJTapVt/view | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | '''Literature study:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''1. Printing with cement-less concrete''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Coppola et al, Binder Alternative to Portland Cement and waste management for sustainable construction, 2018 [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29996741/] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dada, Influence of temperature on the rheological behaviour of eco-mortar, 2021 | ||
| + | [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349412837_Influence_of_temperature_on_the_rheological_behaviour_of_eco-mortar_with_binary_and_ternary_cementitious_blends_of_natural_pozzolana_and_marble_powder] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Djobo et al, Volcanic ash-based geopolymer cements/concretes: the current state of the art and perspectives. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 4433–4446 (2017). [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8230-8] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Liu et al, In-situ resources for infrastructure construction on Mars: A review, 2021 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2021.02.001] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nazneen et al, Geopolymer: A potential alternative binder for the sustainable development of concrete without ordinary Portland cement. Journal of Industrial Pollution Con-trol, 2017, pages 1500-1504. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/GEOPOLYMER-A-POTENTIAL-ALTERNATIVE-BINDER-FOR-THE-Nazneen-Daggubati/b1095cd5b0f0354e254a7498138327d64960a4a5] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Schiavone et al, Pozzolan Based 3D Printing Composites From the Formulation, 2020 | ||
| + | [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347958624_Pozzolan_Based_3D_Printing_Composites_From_the_Formulation_Till_the_Final_Application_in_the_Precision_Irrigation_Field] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Schumacher centre, Alternatives to Portland Cement | ||
| + | [https://www.ctc-n.org/sites/www.ctc-n.org/files/resources/4f561ad5-a0a8-4210-adfb-4b030ae4f5bb.pdf] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''2. In Situ Printing and (AI & HRI supported) in situ assembly of 3D printed components''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | NASA 3D Printed Habitat Challenge: Hassell Studio [https://www.hassellstudio.com/project/nasa-3d-printed-habitat-challenge#:~:text=Our%20aim%20was%20to%20bring,the%20history%20of%20space%20exploration.] | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Overview In-Situ 3D Printing References: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x5olV95jEBAba6_DBVIs7JwtqjblT1-l/view?usp=share_link In-Situ 3D Printing References] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ISRU-BASED ROBOTIC CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR LUNAR AND MARTIAN INFRASTRUCTURES [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347508732_ISRU-BASED_ROBOTIC_CONSTRUCTION_TECHNOLOGIES_FOR_LUNAR_AND_MARTIAN_INFRASTRUCTURES_NIAC_Phase_II_Final_Report] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''3. (AI supported) Environment Control''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Climate-Resilient Robotic Facades: Architectural Strategies to Improve Thermal Comfort in Outdoor Urban Environments using Robotic Assembly | ||
| + | [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2022.856871/full] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''4. CV- and AI-supported Applications in CS and UF''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | MSc 2 IA Studio 2023: Rhizome 2.0 | ||
| + | [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OzG7hewpTbX9HBkPTJcmHw1rJeBDbkm8/view?usp=drive_link] | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 19 June 2024
Rhizome 2.0: Scaling-up Capability of Human-Robot Interaction Supported Approaches for Robotically 3D-printing Extraterrestrial Habitats
Kick-off meeting
Proposal, agenda, and notes:
Proposal https://ideas.esa.int/servlet/hype/IMT?userAction=Browse&templateName=&documentId=941256c1dd12f6338d97081aabbd148f, agenda https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gqgh-6T-0DzogKOD7ikOpL1v9KFzMv9D/view, and notes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1br0DV16xeupi6nuc2ei2Lexgr4abrE8y/view
Presentation:
Henriette Bier: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1S81X1cv65G7uPPnnCV-3fl-NHqJTapVt/view
Literature study:
1. Printing with cement-less concrete
Coppola et al, Binder Alternative to Portland Cement and waste management for sustainable construction, 2018 [1]
Dada, Influence of temperature on the rheological behaviour of eco-mortar, 2021 [2]
Djobo et al, Volcanic ash-based geopolymer cements/concretes: the current state of the art and perspectives. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 4433–4446 (2017). [3]
Liu et al, In-situ resources for infrastructure construction on Mars: A review, 2021 [4]
Nazneen et al, Geopolymer: A potential alternative binder for the sustainable development of concrete without ordinary Portland cement. Journal of Industrial Pollution Con-trol, 2017, pages 1500-1504. [5]
Schiavone et al, Pozzolan Based 3D Printing Composites From the Formulation, 2020 [6]
The Schumacher centre, Alternatives to Portland Cement [7]
2. In Situ Printing and (AI & HRI supported) in situ assembly of 3D printed components
NASA 3D Printed Habitat Challenge: Hassell Studio [8]
Overview In-Situ 3D Printing References: In-Situ 3D Printing References
ISRU-BASED ROBOTIC CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR LUNAR AND MARTIAN INFRASTRUCTURES [9]
3. (AI supported) Environment Control
Climate-Resilient Robotic Facades: Architectural Strategies to Improve Thermal Comfort in Outdoor Urban Environments using Robotic Assembly [10]
4. CV- and AI-supported Applications in CS and UF
MSc 2 IA Studio 2023: Rhizome 2.0 [11]
